Ass Hat
Home
News
Events
Bands
Labels
Venues
Pics
MP3s
Radio Show
Reviews
Releases
Buy$tuff
Forum
  Classifieds
  News
  Localband
  Shows
  Show Pics
  Polls
  
  OT Threads
  Other News
  Movies
  VideoGames
  Videos
  TV
  Sports
  Gear
  /r/
  Food
  
  New Thread
  New Poll
Miscellaneous
Links
E-mail
Search
End Ass Hat
login

New site? Maybe some day.
Username:
SPAM Filter: re-type this (values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
Message:


UBB enabled. HTML disabled Spam Filtering enabledIcons: (click image to insert) Show All - pop

b i u  add: url  image  video(?)
: post by arilliusbm at 2011-06-29 18:08:32
arktouros said[orig][quote]
arilliusbm said[orig][quote]
there were a number of problems: (spoilers below)
1.) not too sure how I feel about Spock going back in time, etc.
2.) some parts reminded me way too much of star wars (random alien guy at the bar, spock/yoda similarities, monsters on a snow world with a snow cave - Hoth much?)
3.) could have found a better Russian actor instead of that annoying kid
4.) not enough character development for the antagonists
5.) some of it reminded me of Starship Troopers. just some parts were a little cheesy.
6.) they should have destroyed the drill in the first place
7.) we need more Cho
8.) NO KLINGONS AT ALL IN THE MOVIE, ONLY MENTIONS OF THEM


1) trek has always been very liberal with time travel and they do it in many ways (warp, transwarp, borg portals, the end of voyager, wormholes, etc...) and this isn't the first time that trek has pulled the "meeting your older self" trick.
2) the random alien guy at the bar is MORNE from deep space 9. there are at least a couple episodes based on him. he is in most bar scenes and never says a word. i won't even get into how yoda is a ripoff of spock. the ice planet - they needed some desolate place to dump kirk off, meet spock and put a federation outpost, i guess. jungle planet, desert planet, ice planet. it's all been done. trek > wars, etc etc
3) the kid had big shoes to fill and he did a good job. in the 60's series especially, chekov was crucial, having a russian on tv was huge.
4) i agree with this, but they really only needed some absolute evil psychopath who didn't need much development, just a thin back story. they had to use a romulan instead of a klingon, because the romulan would have had a connection to the vulcans and therefore destroying planet vulcan would have greater impact.
5) star trek is the king of cheese. i was surprised there was no obligatory phaser battle in some red rock canyon.
6) the drill's whatever field screwed with the enterprise sensors. LIKE ALWAYS.
7) no, we need more GAY ZULU
8) klingons weren't in the fight and would not have been interacting with the federation at that time.

i just wanted to prove aril wrong two years later. just watched this again the other night, it still rules. everyone is onboard and working on a sequel due out next year. the only problem i have with the new cast, is it's cool they got john cho to play zulu, but out of respect to george takei, they should have made the character 100% more homosexual. in this timeline, vulcan is destroyed, and i'm curious to see where they go with that.


First off, thank you for flexing your Trekkie knowledge muscles for everyone, even with generalities stated. It far outweighs mine, as I stopped watching and/or caring about Star Trek after TNG ceased. I'm with Shane, fuck DS9. I know a lot of people enjoyed it, but I saw one episode and went back to watching reruns of the original series and TNG. I never considered myself a Trekkie per se and just had a general interest in it, considering I love sci-fi and grew up watching TNG. But not once did I ever obsess over it. I'm a traditionalist: anything after TNG is false IMHO.

That being said, here is a slight rebuttal at best, and I hope no offense shall be taken:

1) Indeed. But I wasn't exactly sure how I felt about this part of the story when the movie came out. After giving it some thought, though, I chose to accept it rather than frown upon it. I kind of sneered at the idea when I saw it in the movie.
2) Don't care for MORN, don't care for DS9. I thought the scene was straight-up homage to SW, and unlike anything I've ever seen in a ST episode or movie. If there was one scene that this was made to appeal to a new generation of fans, then I'd pick this as being in the top 5. Frankly, I could give a rat's ass about any alien race they created after TNG. And yes, Snow monster = more homage to SW, trying to draw some SW fans over to the Trek. Everything's been done, but I still think that was blatantly obvious.
3) Kid was annoying and did a bad job, important role or not. Of course, this is subjective.
4) Nothing to say, it had its flaws with character development.
5) King of Cheese? In some ways, yes. In other ways, no. This movie had some uncharacteristic cheesiness in it, at least I thought that when I saw it. Haven't seen it in a while though, and am looking forward to watching it again.
6) Obviously this happens. Suspense.
7) Needs more Cho. Needs more Harold and Kumar. Needs more Asians.
8) While that is true, it would have been nice to actually SEE their rendition of a Klingon at some point in the movie, whether it be through a cut-scene or something. Even though it wouldn't add to the plot of the movie, Klingons are kvlt. I guess it makes sense though, because they'd want to build up future interest for other movies.
[default homepage] [print][3:55:26am Apr 28,2024
load time 0.02617 secs/10 queries]
[search][refresh page]